Skip to content
VidaPocket
Live with pharma partners

Innovative PAP

A Patient Assistance Program that reaches the patients a flat discount misses.

Why today's programs stop short, the philosophy behind ours, and exactly how the engine works — from assessment to a patient on therapy.

The problem

Southeast Asia's access gap is large — and growing.

Across targeted oncology, biologics and specialty therapies, SEA patients are reached at a fraction of mature-market rates.

Key challenges in SEA

  1. 01

    Lack of reimbursement

    Less than 5% of innovative therapies are publicly reimbursed.

  2. 02

    Low private insurance

    Under 10% hold private cover, and many policies exclude high-cost treatment.

  3. 03

    No structured financing

    Outside pharma PAPs there is no viable route to fund therapy.

  4. 04

    HCP self-censorship

    Physicians assume patients can't afford the best option — and don't prescribe it.

Access to innovative therapies — how SEA compares

  1. United States92 on a relative index of 100
  2. European Union84 on a relative index of 100
  3. Developed Asia70 on a relative index of 100
  4. Developing SEA42 on a relative index of 100
  5. Emerging SEA24 on a relative index of 100

Mature-market benchmark· Indicative, combined access across targeted oncology, biologics, specialty therapies and high-value vaccines.

A different philosophy

Equality gives everyone the same box. Equity gives everyone the same view.

Fixed-scheme programs treat every patient identically. Means-based programs size support to need — the right idea, held back until now by the wrong execution.

Can seeCan seeBlocked

Equality

All patients receive a similar discount — 50% off, or buy-one-free-one — regardless of their ability to pay.

Patient
Many still can't afford treatment, even at the discounted price.
Pharma
Limited penetration and inefficient allocation of a finite budget.
HCP
Often unable to prescribe the best treatment for many patients.

Means-based is the right idea. The execution has been the problem — and that is exactly what VidaPocket fixes.

Why today's PAPs fall short

PAPs exist — but the industry has learned they have structural limits.

Flat discounts widen access but leave real value unrealised. A tiered model reaches more patients — sustainably.

How PAPs work today

  1. 1

    Patient prescribed

    HCP prescribes an innovative therapy and refers the patient to the PAP.

  2. 2

    Paper-based application

    Manual forms, submitted by hospital staff. Days to weeks of waiting.

  3. 3

    Basic income check

    A formal income validation — not a true needs assessment.

  4. 4

    Flat discount applied

    One discount for everyone, regardless of affordability.

  5. 5

    No outcome tracking

    Pharma has no visibility into completion, drop-out or ROI.

Not just oncology. This applies to any medicine where affordability is the barrier — biologics, specialty and chronic therapies alike.

Three structural limits

Limit 01

Paper-based and manual

Weeks to eligibility. Admin burden on hospital staff. A poor patient experience at the worst possible time.

Limit 02

Blunt means-testing

Income-only assessment over-discounts patients who could pay more — and misses those who genuinely cannot.

Limit 03

Revenue cannibalisation

Flat discounts compress net revenue without proportional volume gain. The maths rarely works.

How VidaPocket works

Three steps. One continuously improving engine.

Assess — beyond income. Our proprietary means-testing methodology scores affordability on 20+ socioeconomic variables — assets, household composition, geography, consumption behaviour — not declared income alone. Harder to game, and granular enough to support real tiers.

Live assessment

Scoring affordability

  • Income
  • Assets
  • Household
  • Geography
  • Behaviour
  • + 15 more signals

Proprietary methodology — validated on 1,000+ respondents

The algorithm never stands still. Every assessment feeds back into the model, so tier boundaries and variable weights keep improving. The logic stays sound — and the discount allocation stays right.

Why VidaPocket

Traditional PAP vs. VidaPocket.

A flat discount treats every patient the same; VidaPocket sizes support to what each patient can pay.

Funding sourcesTraditional PAP: Pharma discount onlyVidaPocket: Pooled, multi-funder
Means-testing methodTraditional PAP: Income onlyVidaPocket: 20+ variables
Eligibility speedTraditional PAP: WeeksVidaPocket: Hours to days
Hospital admin burdenTraditional PAP: HighVidaPocket: Minimal
Methodology evolutionTraditional PAP: StaticVidaPocket: Real-time, AI-driven
Outcome visibilityTraditional PAP: NoneVidaPocket: Live dashboard

20+

Affordability signals

Assets, household, geography, behaviour — not an income line on a form.

Self-improving

Every assessment retrains the model. The allocation keeps getting more accurate.

One platform, every source of support

Live: pharma programsNext: lending · charity · public

Want to see what a tiered program would look like for your product and market?

Talk to us

How we work together

Flexible models, built around your program.

Co-create a pilot

We design the program together. We build, deploy and manage; you own the PAP funding envelope and eligibility criteria.

Best for teams with an existing asset and a market they want to go deeper in.

Timeline to value

  1. Week 1–2

    Align on program design

  2. Week 3–4

    Program configuration

  3. Week 5–6

    Pilot launch

  4. Week 8+

    First patients onboarded

VidaPocket provides
Platform · Means-testing · Patient support · Reporting
You provide
PAP funding · Eligibility criteria · Brand-team access
Discuss this model

Let's design your program together.

One call. Your program, product or funding challenge. A tailored proposal in return.

Built for

  • Pharma
  • Ministries of Health
  • Banks & fintech
  • Charities
  • Hospitals
  • Distributors
  • Pharma
  • Ministries of Health
  • Banks & fintech
  • Charities
  • Hospitals
  • Distributors
  • Pharma
  • Ministries of Health
  • Banks & fintech
  • Charities
  • Hospitals
  • Distributors